There are two opinions that histories have, when dealing with this question. Some historians say that the appeasement wasn't justified and that Chamberlain was a weak person while of the other hand some say that Chamberlain didn't have any other chose. There are a number of reasons that support both of the sides. Appeasement was justified in a few ways, sympathy for Germany, the desire for peace, the threat of communism and the time to …showed first 75 words of 805 total…

…showed last 75 words of 805 total…Czechoslovakia to Hitler, where as, Czechoslovakia had a modern army and had a chance to resist Germany. As a conclusion there are a number of reasons that support both sides of the argument. But for my point of view, the appeasement was not justified. I believe this due to the fact that if Britain and France took a more severe action against Germany, there would have been a chance that world war two hadn't occurred.