Explanation for why the Big 3 at Versailles were in such disagreement.
Title: Explanation for why the Big 3 at Versailles were in such disagreement.
Category: /History/World History
Details: Words: 499 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
Explanation for why the Big 3 at Versailles were in such disagreement.
Category: /History/World History
Details: Words: 499 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
The "Big 3", Georges Clemenceau, Woodrow Wilson and Lloyd George, disagreed so strongly on the Treaty of Versailles because it was no more than a compromise, it satisfied nobody. All three of them had a different stance on whether or not the treaty was satisfactory. Clemenceau thought it would be better for Germany to suffer a great deal more than the treaty allowed, while Wilson considered the treaty far too harsh. Lloyd George on the other
showed first 75 words of 499 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 499 total
War 2.
<Tab/>It can easily be seen now that the reason "the big 3" disagreed so strongly is due to their difference in opinion. While Clemenceau's main objective was to bring Germany to its knees, Wilson's was to bring upon the land a time of peace and friendship. Lloyd George's stance came roughly between that of France and America. All this is grounds for their lack of acceptance for each other's ideas.